Ferromagnetic Ordering in Binuclear Copper Complexes
A R T I C L E S
Table 1. Crystallographic Data of 1a
ment of the two copper(II)-homonuclear units through the
intramolecular eight oxygen bridging atoms belonging to the
four benzoato ligands.
formula
fw
crystal system
space group
Z, Z′
C32H32Cu2O10S2
767.78
monoclinic
P21/n
2. Experimental Methods
4, 1
2.1. Electronic spectra were measured with a Shimadzu UV-
3100S spectrophotometer on ca. 10-4 M chloroform solutions
at 298 K (λ ) 200-2200 nm). A Nicolet Magna-IR 750
spectrophotometer was employed to monitor the infrared spectra,
using KBr and polyethylene pellets. ESR spectra at X-band
frequency were obtained with a JEOL JES-RES 3X spectrom-
eter, from 300 to 77 K, on polycrystalline powder samples.
Magnetic measurements were performed in gelatin capsule using
a Quantum Design magnetometer. The calculated Pascal16
constant for compound 1a is about 264 × 10-6 emu and was
not taken into account, owing to its small value as compared
with the measured data. Measurements were performed in small
magnetic fields, from 20 to 180 G, and in the range 2-300 K,
in zero field-cooling (ZFC) and field-cooling (FC) modes.
2.2. The synthesis of 1a was carried out using the direct
synthesis method.17 Equimolar amounts (0.3143 mmol) of
copper(0), (-)-sparteine (sp), benzoyl bromide, and dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO) (0.85 mL) were placed in a flask, and the
mixture was stirred at 70 °C for 24 h. The mixture was then
filtered at 70 °C and the resulting solution cooled to room
temperature, allowing the separation of 1a as dark-green crystals
suitable for X-ray crystallography (yield: 5%), 1b, which was
identified as the phase previously reported for the same
compound (yield: 64%),2 and other products identified as:
[(Br)(PhCO2)(sp)]Cu(II),18 [Br2(sp)]Cu(II),19 [Br2(DMSO)2]Cu-
(II),20 and [(PhCO2)2(sp)]Cu(II).21 1a: mp 268-270 °C dec
UV-vis /CHCl3 λmax/ꢀ (nm/M-1 cm-1): 273/2479, 667/731;
IR/KBr, PET ν (cm-1): ν (COO) 1633 st. asymm., ν (COO)
1406 st. symm., ν(DMSO) 1024, ν (Cu-O) 495; ESR (powdered
sample) at 300 and 77 K: g1 ) 16.966, g2 ) 3.508, g3 ) 2.287,
g4 ) 1.953, g5 ) 1.417, g6 ) 1.385.
a, Å
b, Å
c, Å
12.0407(9)
17.0916(13)
17.2680(15)
103.062(6)
3461.7(5)
1.473
1.402
0.0540, 0.0840
1.016
â, deg
V, Å3
F
calc, g.cm-3
m, mm-1
a
R1, wR2
GOF a
a
∑||Fo| - |Fc||
∑|Fo|
∑w(Fo2 - Fc2)2
∑w(Fo2 - Fc2)2
R1 )
, wR2 )
, S )
2
∑w(Fo )2
x
m - n
x
to model S atoms with disordered sites, although slightly
improving R indices, were unsatisfactory, since they produced
prolate thermal ellipsoids and did not converge to a sensible
geometry for the minor parts of disordered sites. Highest
residuals probably reflect thermal motions for S atoms rather
than actual disorders.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Synthesis. The direct synthesis method, based on the
use of zerovalent metals as starting materials, provides a suitable
environment for the synthesis of different complexes of copper-
(II) as many ligands are present in the reaction medium. The
control of the reaction conditions (temperature, reaction time,
and solvent) allows increasing the yield of the complex of
interest without residual salts. The absence of residual salts
greatly favors the formation of pure phases, which may be easily
separated from the reaction medium.25 In the present work, this
methodology was essential for the isolation of two polymorphs
for the complex [(PhCO2)4(DMSO)2]Cu2, 1a and 1b, one of
which, 1a, is obtained with 5% yield.
3.2. Solid-State Structure. The asymmetric unit of 1a
consists of one binuclear Cu(II) complex in general position,
including four bridging benzoato ligands and two coordinated
DMSO molecules (Figure 1). The geometry around each Cu-
(II) ion in the dimer unit may be described by a slightly distorted
square pyramid, consistent with small geometric τ parameters:
2.3. X-ray diffraction data were collected at 296 K on a P4
diffractometer using Mo KR radiation (λ ) 0.71073 Å) and
following standard procedures.22 Relevant crystallographic data
are listed in Table 1. Data were collected at 0.84 Å resolution
and corrected for absorption effects on the basis of 20 ψ-scans
(transmission factors in the range 0.673-0.774). The structure
was solved and refined using routine methods.23,24 H atoms were
placed in idealized positions and constrained to ride on their
carrier C atoms. In the last difference map, two high residuals
are observed close to S atoms of DMSO molecules. Attempts
26
0.026 Å for Cu1 and 0.100 Å for Cu2. Four O atoms of the
four benzoato moieties conform the square base, with Cu-O
bond lengths spanning the small range 1.947(3)-1.984(3) Å
(Table 2). DMSO molecules are axially coordinated to the
metallic centers through their O atoms, at expected distances,
2.137(3) and 2.157(3) Å. The bridging networks Cu-O-C-
O-Cu are planar and give a Cu‚‚‚Cu separation of 2.6494(8)
Å. This is shorter than some distances previously reported1,8,15,27-29
but comparable to the mean value of 2.661 Å, computed from
(16) O’Connor, C. J. In Progress in Inorganic Chemistry; Lippard, S. J., Ed.;
Wiley: EUA, 1982; Vol. 29, p 203.
(17) Gutie´rrez, R.; Va´zquez, J.; Va´zquez, R. A.; Reyes, Y.; Toscano, R. A.;
Martinez, M.; AÄ lvarez, C. J. Coord. Chem. 2001, 54, 313-321.
(18) Reyes-Ortega, Y.; Alca´ntara-Flores, J.-L.; Herna´ndez-Galindo, M. C.;
Gutie´rrez-Pe´rez, R.; Ram´ırez-Rosales, D.; Berne`s, S.; Dura´n-Herna´ndez,
A.; Zamorano-Ulloa, R. J. Mol. Struct. Manuscript submitted
(19) Alca´ntara-Flores, J. L.; Ram´ırez-Rosales, D.; Berne`s, S.; Pe´rez-Ram´ırez
(Bokhimi), J. G.; Dura´n-Herna´ndez, A.; Gutie´rrez-Pe´rez, R.; Zamorano-
Ulloa, R.; Reyes-Ortega, Y. J. Mol. Struct. 2004, 693, 125-131.
(20) Willett, R. D.; Jardine, F. H.; Roberts, S. A. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1977, 25,
97-101.
(25) Sikorav, S.; Bkouche-Waksman, I.; Kahn, O. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 490-
495.
(21) Reyes-Ortega, Y.; Alca´ntara-Flores, J.-L.; Herna´ndez-Galindo, Ma. del C.;
Gutie´rrez-Pe´rez, R.; Ram´ırez-Rosales, D.; Berne`s, S.; Cabrera-Vivas, B.
M.; Dura´n-Herna´ndez, A.; Zamorano-Ulloa, R. Manuscript to be submitted.
(22) XSCAnS Users Manual, release 2.21; Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments
Inc.: Madison, WI, 1996.
(23) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXTL-Plus, release 5.10; Siemens Analytical X-ray
Instruments Inc.: Madison, WI, 1998.
(24) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELX 97-2, Users Manual; University of Go¨ttingen:
Germany 1997.
(26) Addison, A. W.; Nageswara Rao, T.; Reedijk, J.; van Rijn, J.; Verschoor,
G. C. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1984, 1349-1356.
(27) McKee, V.; Dagdigian, J. V.; Bau, R.; Reed, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1981, 103, 7000-7001.
(28) Rodriguez-Mart´ın, Y.; Ruiz-Pe´rez, C.; Sanchiz, J.; Lloret, F.; Julve, M.
Inorg. Chim. Acta 2001, 318, 159-165.
(29) Mallah, T.; Boillot, M.-L.; Kahn, O.; Gouteron, J.; Jeannin, S.; Jeannin,
Y. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 3058-3065.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 46, 2005 16313