Journal of Natural Products
Article
repeatability (intraday) and intermediate precision (interday). Intraday
and interday variations were established using six replicates within the
same day and three consecutive days (a total of 18 determinations),
respectively. Recovery experiments were performed in order to study
the accuracy of the method. The samples were spiked with known
amounts of the standards, at different concentrations levels (low,
medium, and high): 1 (10, 50, and 150 μg/mL), 3 (50, 150, and 350
μg/mL), 4 (10, 100, and 300 μg/mL), and 7 (10, 60, and 150 μg/mL).
The average recoveries were calculated by the following formula:
recovery (%) = [(amount found − original amount)/amount spiked]
Author Contributions
†
A. Perez-Vasquez and E. Castillejos-Ramır
́
́
́
ez contributed
equally to this work.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grants from Consejo Nacional de
■
Ciencia y Tecnologıa
́
(CONACyT, Proyecto99395) and
×
100%. The stability was tested by analyzing the sample solution at
DGAPA-UNAM PAPIIT IN212913. The technical assistance
of I. Rivero-Cruz, R. I. del Villar, M. Gutierrez, G. Duarte-Lisci,
different time points (0, 12, 24, and 48 h), and peak areas of all
standards were recorded and compared. The % RSD ≤ 2.0 was taken
as a measure of precision and stability.
́
and R. del Carmen-Lezama is also recognized. E.C. and S.C.
acknowledge scholarships awarded by CONACyT to carry out
graduate studies.
Acute Toxicity. The toxicity studies and antidiabetic assays were
performed on male ICR mice (body weight range, 20−25 g). The
animals were purchased from Centro UNAM-Harlan (Mexico City,
Mexico). Mice were housed in a climate- and light-controlled room
with a 12 h light/dark cycle and maintained on a standard pellet diet
and water ad libitum. Procedures involving animals and their care were
conducted in conformity with the Mexican Official Norm for Animal
Care and Handling (NOM-062-ZOO-1999) and in compliance with
international rules on care and use of laboratory animals. The
Institutional Committee for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
DEDICATION
■
Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Otto Sticher, of ETH-Zurich, Zurich,
Switzerland, for his pioneering work in pharmacognosy and
phytochemistry.
REFERENCES
■
(
3
1) Andrade-Cetto, A.; Heinrich, M. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 99,
25−348.
(
FQ/CICUAL/021/11) of Facultad de Quım
́
ica, UNAM, approved
the experimental protocols. The test was conducted in two phases, as
described previously.
11
(2) Martínez, M. Las Plantas Medicinales de Mex
Mexico City, 1989; p 87.
3) Linares, E.; Bye, R. A. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1987, 19, 153−183.
4) Sanchez-Viesca, F. Phytochemistry 1969, 8, 1821−1823.
5) Mata, R.; Calzada, F.; García, M.; Reguero, M. J. Nat. Prod. 1987,
́
ico; Ediciones Botas:
́
Acute Hypoglycemic and Oral Sucrose Tolerance Tests. The
aqueous extracts at different doses (100, 300, and 500 mg/kg bw) and
control drugs (glibenclamide 10 mg/kg bw; acarbose, 5 mg/kg bw)
were suspended in the vehicle (Tween 80, NaCl 0.9%). Sucrose (2 g/
kg) was used for the carbohydrate tolerance test. The control mice
group received only the vehicle. Treatments were orally given in all
cases. Blood samples were collected from caudal vein by means of a
small incision in the end of the tail. Blood glucose levels (mg/dL) were
estimated by a commercial glucometer (One Touch Ultra, Milpitas,
CA, USA). The hypoglycemic test and the oral sucrose tolerance test
(
(
(
́
5
(
(
0, 866−870.
6) Mata, R.; Calzada, F.; García, M. J. Nat. Prod. 1988, 51, 851−856.
7) Pinto, A.; Capasso, A.; Sorrentino, L. Arzneimittelforschung 1997,
4
(
7, 829−833.
8) Guerrero-Analco, J.; Medina-Campos, O.; Brindis, F.; Bye, R.;
Pedraza-Chaverri, J.; Navarrete, A.; Mata, R. Phytochemistry 2007, 68,
087−2095.
9) Deciga-Campos, M.; Guerrero-Analco, J. A.; Quijano, L.; Mata, R.
2
(
12
were conducted as previously described. Percentage variation of
glycemia for each group was calculated with respect to initial (0 h)
level according to the following: % variation of glycemia = [(G − G )/
́
Pharmacol., Biochem. Behav. 2006, 83, 342−348.
i
t
(
(
(
10) Noster, S.; Kraus, L. J. Planta Med. 1990, 56, 63−65.
11) Lorke, D. Arch. Toxicol. 1983, 54, 275−287.
12) Escandon-Rivera, S.; Gonzalez-Andrade, M.; Bye, R.; Linares, E.;
́ ́
G ] × 100%, where G is initial glycemia values and G is the glycemia
i
i
t
value after sample administration. Both studies were performed in
12
normoglycemic and NA/STZ-diabetic mice.
Diabetes was induced by a single ip (intraperitoneal) injection of
Navarrete, A.; Mata, R. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 968−974.
13) Rodriguez de Sotillo, D. V.; Hadley, M. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2002,
3, 717−726.
14) Cruz-Morales, S.; Castan
Mendoza-García, A. D.; Lorence, A.; Pereda-Miranda, R. J. Nat. Prod.
012, 75, 1603−1611.
15) Aquino, R.; D’Agosino, M.; De Simone, F.; Pizza, C.
Phytochemistry 1988, 27, 1827−1830.
16) Mata, R.; Del Rayo-Camacho, M.; Mendoza, S.; Cruz, M. C.
Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 3199−3201.
17) Cristians, S.; Guerrero-Analco, J. A.; Per
(
1
(
2
0
freshly prepared STZ (120 mg/kg bw) as previously described. Mice
with blood glucose levels higher than 200 mg/dL were considered
̃
́ ́
eda-Gomez, J.; Figueroa-Gonzalez, G.;
12
diabetic and included in the study.
Statistical Analysis. Data are expressed as the means ± SEM for
the number of animals in each group (n = 6). Analysis of variance
2
(
(
ANOVA) was used to analyze the changes in blood glucose and other
parameters. Dunnett range posthoc comparisons were used to
determine the source of significant differences where appropriate; p
(
<
0.05 was considered statistically significant. Prisma Graph-Pad
(
́ ́
ez-Vasquez, A.;
(
version 4.0) software was used for statistics.
Palacios-Espinosa, F.; Ciangherotti, C.; Bye, R.; Mata, R. J. Nat.
Prod. 2009, 72, 408−413.
(
18) Novak
18.
19) ICH. Harmonized Tripartite Guideline. Validation of Analytical
́ ́ ́
ova, L.; Matysova, L.; Solich, P. Talanta 2006, 68, 908−
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
9
* Supporting Information
S
(
UV and selected NMR spectra for compound 2. Full tables and
figures of hypoglycemic and antihyperglycemic effects of the
on 03.06.2012).
(20) Masiello, P.; Broca, C.; Gross, R.; Roye, M.; Manteghetti, M.;
Hillaire-Buys, D.; Novelli, M.; Ribes, G. Diabetes 1998, 47, 224−229.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Author
E
dx.doi.org/10.1021/np400785z | J. Nat. Prod. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX