Synthesis and Structure–Property Relationships of Hybrid p Systems
FULL PAPER
ing mixture was stirred for 14 h at room temperature. A saturated aque-
ous solution of NH4Cl was then added and insoluble substances were fil-
tered off through a Celite bed. The organic layer was separated and the
aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc/hexane (1:1). The organic com-
bines were washed with water, dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated. The
residue was subjected to silica gel column chromatography (CH2Cl2/ace-
tone=15:1 to 10:1). The blue fluorescent fraction (Rf =0.63 at CH2Cl2/
acetone=10:1) was collected, evaporated, and recrystallized from
CH2Cl2/hexane to give compound 6 (127 mg, 54%) as a yellow solid.
M.p. 206–2078C (decomp); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2): d=7.28–7.80
(m, 14H), 7.51 ppm (d, J=41.5 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz,
CD2Cl2): d=122.5, 124.7, 125.1 (d, J=11.5 Hz), 125.4 (d, J=9.9 Hz),
126.0, 129.3 (d, J=10.7 Hz), 129.4 (d, J=12.3 Hz), 129.7 (d, J=10.7 Hz),
130.3 (d, J=99.6 Hz), 131.1 (d, J=10.7 Hz), 133.0 (d, J=7.8 Hz), 132.9,
133.0 (d, J=107.8 Hz), 133.8, 134.3 (d, J=93.9 Hz), 136.7 (d, J=14.8 Hz),
137.0 (d, J=2.5 Hz), 137.2 (d, J=2.5 Hz), 139.6, 140.5, 142.1 ppm (d, J=
27.2 Hz); 31P{1H} NMR (162 MHz, CD2Cl2): d=34.3 ppm; IR (neat):
n˜max =1195 cmꢀ1 (P=O); HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C22H16OPS:
359.0654; found: 359.0640 [M+H+]; elemental analysis calcd (%) for
C22H15OPS: C 73.73, H 4.22, S 8.95, P 8.64; Found: C 73.83, H 4.22, S
8.89, P 8.44.
aloyl alcohol (16 mL, 0.14 mmol) in DMF (1.6 mL) was stirred for 3 d at
100–1208C under an oxygen atmosphere. The mixture was then diluted
with EtOAc/hexane (1:1) and insoluble substances were filtered off
through a Celite bed. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc/
hexane (1:1) and the organic combines were washed with water, dried
over MgSO4, and evaporated. The residue was subjected to silica gel
column chromatography (CH2Cl2/acetone=10:1). The purple fluorescent
fraction (Rf =0.33) was collected and evaporated to give compound 9
(29 mg, 51%) as an orange solid. M.p. 209–2118C (decomp); 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CD2Cl2): d=1.25 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.27 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H),
1.81–1.91 (m, 4H), 3.20–3.25 (m, 2H), 3.33–3.38 (m, 2H), 3.96 (s, 3H),
7.24–7.37 (m, 5H), 7.43–7.49 (m, 2H), 7.59–7.70 (m, 4H), 8.04 (dd, J=
3.3, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.11 ppm (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H); 31P{1H} NMR (162 MHz,
CDCl3): d=27.7 ppm; IR (neat): n˜max =1196 cmꢀ1 (P=O); HRMS (ESI):
m/z calcd for C31H31NOP: 464.2138: found: 464.2130 [M+H+].
X-ray crystallographic analyses: Single crystals of cis-3, 5, and 6 were
grown from CH2Cl2/hexane at room temperature. X-ray crystallographic
measurements were made on a Rigaku Saturn CCD area detector with
graphite monochromated MoKa radiation (0.71070 ꢂ) at ꢀ1308C. The
data were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects. The structures
were solved by using a direct method[19] and refined by full-matrix least-
squares techniques against F2 by using SHELXL-97.[20] The non-hydrogen
atoms were refined anisotropically, and hydrogen atoms were refined by
using the rigid model. All calculations were performed by using the Crys-
talStructure crystallographic software package[21] except for the refine-
ment. CCDC-894432 (cis-3), 894434 (5), and 894433 (6), contain the sup-
plementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be ob-
tained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre
Compound 7: A mixture of [Pd2ACHTNUTRGNE(NUG dba)3] (18 mg, 0.02 mmol), (2-furyl)3P
(36 mg, 0.16 mmol), and NMP (1.6 mL) was stirred for 1 h at room tem-
perature. Compound 2 (201 mg, 0.66 mmol), N-methyl-2-(tributylstanny-
l)indole (0.30 mL, 0.65 mmol), NMP (6.4 mL), and CuI (142 mg,
0.75 mmol) were added to this mixture and the resulting mixture was stir-
red for 3.5 h at room temperature. A saturated aqueous solution of
NH4Cl was then added and insoluble substances were filtered off through
a Celite bed. The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was
extracted with EtOAc/hexane (1:1). The organic combines were washed
with water, dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated. The residue was subject-
ed to silica gel column chromatography (CH2Cl2/acetone=10:1). The
yellow fluorescent fraction (Rf =0.41) was collected, evaporated, and re-
crystallized from CH2Cl2/hexane to give compound 7 (147 mg, 63%) as a
yellow-green solid. M.p. 172–1738C (decomp); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CD2Cl2): d=3.93 (s, 3H), 6.87 (s, 1H), 7.05 (dd, J=6.8, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.23
(dd, J=6.8, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.42 (m, 3H),
7.46–7.58 (m, 4H), 7.52 (d, J=35.6 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (dd, J=7.8, 8.3 Hz,
1H), 7.74 ppm (dd, J=8.3, 13.7 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz,
CD2Cl2): d=32.5, 105.9 (d, J=3.3 Hz), 109.8, 120.4, 121.5, 123.6, 125.3 (d,
J=9.9 Hz), 127.9, 129.3 (d, J=19.8 Hz), 129.3 (d, J=12.3 Hz), 129.4 (d,
J=19.8 Hz), 130.8 (d, J=112.0 Hz), 131.1 (d, J=10.7 Hz), 131.9 (d, J=
67.5 Hz), 132.7 (d, J=2.5 Hz), 133.0 (d, J=16.5 Hz), 133.7 (d, J=1.6 Hz),
136.0 (d, J=18.1 Hz), 139.8, 142.4, 142.7 ppm; 31P{1H} NMR (162 MHz,
CDCl3): d=35.5 ppm; IR (neat): n˜max =1191 cmꢀ1 (P=O); HRMS (ESI):
m/z calcd for C22H19NOP: 356.1199; found: 356.1184 [M+H+].
Computational details: The structures of compounds 3–7 and the model
compounds 8m and 9m were optimized by using DFT with the 6-31G*
basis set.[22] The functional of the DFT calculations was the Becke, three-
parameter, Lee–Yang–Parr (B3LYP) exchange-correlation functional.[23]
We confirmed that the optimized geometries were not in saddle but in
stable points. For compounds 5, 6, and 7, the potential energy surfaces of
the S0 and S1 states along the dihedral angles were performed by B3LYP
and TD-B3LYP methods with the cc-pVDZ basis set to elucidate the rel-
ative stability and rotational barriers between two stable geometries.[24]
The effect of CH2Cl2 was estimated by the polarizable continuum model
(PCM) method. The Cartesian coordinates are summarized in Table S1
in the Supporting Information. All calculations were carried out by using
the Gaussian 09 suite of programs.[25]
Fluorescence lifetime measurement and analysis: The time-resolved fluo-
rescence spectra were measured by a streak camera (Hamamatsu Pho-
tonics, C4331). The output (780 nm, ꢁ120 fs FWHM) of the optical para-
metric amplifier (Spectra Physics, TOPAS) excited by an amplified Ti:-
sapphire laser system (Spectra Physics, Spitfire XP, 800 nm, ꢁ120 fs
FWHM) was frequency-doubled to 390 nm by a BBO crystal, and used
as an excitation pulse (for the excitation of compound 8, the excitation
pulse of 360 nm was produced). The color sensitivity and the time-zero of
the streak images were corrected as previously reported.[26] Dichloro-
Compound 8: A mixture of compound 6 (60 mg, 0.17 mmol), 4-octyne
(0.12 mL, 0.81 mmol), PdACHTUNGTRNEUG(N OAc)2 (14 mg, 0.060 mmol), K2CO3 (8 mg,
0.06 mmol), tetrabutylammonium bromide (27 mg, 0.085 mmol), and piv-
aloyl alcohol (0.020 mL, 0.17 mmol) in DMF (3 mL) was stirred for 9 d at
100–1208C under an oxygen atmosphere. The mixture was then diluted
with EtOAc/hexane (1:1) and insoluble substances were filtered off
through a Celite bed. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc/
hexane (1:1), and the organic combines were washed with water, dried
over MgSO4, and evaporated. The residue was subjected to silica gel
column chromatography (CH2Cl2/acetone=20:1). The purple fluorescent
fraction (Rf =0.24) was collected and evaporated to give compound 8
(11 mg, 14%) as an orange solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2): d=1.26
(t, J=7.3 Hz, 3H), 1.27 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 3H), 1.80–1.89 (m, 4H), 3.22–3.27
(m, 2H), 3.33–3.37 (m, 2H), 7.36–7.41 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.53 (m, 4H), 7.64–
7.71 (m, 3H), 7.76 (dd, J=7.3, 11.2 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 1H),
8.09 (dd, J=3.9, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.26 ppm (d, J=7.8 Hz, 1H); 31P{1H} NMR
(162 Hz, CD2Cl2): d=27.20 ppm; IR (neat): n˜max =1201 cmꢀ1 (P=O);
ACHUTNGRENUNmG ethACHTUGNTRENaNUGN ne, acetonitrile, and benzene (spectroscopic grade) were used as re-
ceived. As shown in Figure 7a, the spectral shape of compound 7 was de-
pendent on the delay time after the excitation, suggesting that there are
several species that show emission. In order to extract the number of spe-
cies, which contributed to the time-resolved spectra, SVD analysis was
applied to the time-resolved spectra.[27] In the SVD analysis, the time-re-
solved spectra are decomposed into the spectral components and their
time profiles weighted by their singular values (SVs). The spectral com-
ponents that have large singular values are considered to be real compo-
nents, and other components are disregarded as noise. The spectra com-
ponents obtained by the SVD analysis for typical experimental condi-
tions are given in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information. For example,
the SV of the third component in Figure S2 in the Supporting Informa-
tion is much smaller relative to the largest one (0.02) and could be ne-
glected. All fluorescence spectra of compound 7 in different solvents
were decomposed into two components spectra. Time profiles of the de-
composed spectra are shown in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information.
HRMSACHTUNGTRENNUNG(MALDI): m/z calcd for C30H28OPS: 467.1593; found: 467.1614
[M+H+].
Compound 9: A mixture of compound 7 (44 mg, 0.12 mmol), 4-octyne
(50 mL, 0.35 mmol), Pd
ACHTUGNTREN(NUNG OAc)2 (8 mg, 0.04 mmol), K2CO3 (7 mg,
0.05 mmol), tetrabutylammonium bromide (24 mg, 0.074 mmol), and piv-
Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 15972 – 15983
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
15981