Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
possibility that a different, fleeting (nonaccumulating)
succinate-ligated ferryl complexpossibly in an “offline”
configuration and originating from earlier pathway bifurca-
tioninitiates ethylene production. Indeed, Zhang et al.
proposed a ferryl-mediated Grob-like fragmentation of
succinate involving migration of electron density over seven
atomic centers (this type of concerted fragmentation more
typically involves only five centers), in which the Fe(IV) center
would function, uncharacteristically, as a nucleofuge by
accepting two electrons from the coordinated succinate
carboxylate (Scheme 2).16 An alternative means by which a
distinct, undetected ferryl complex could initiate ethylene
production would involve single-electron transfer (most likely
coupled to proton transfer) to the Fe(IV) center from the
succinate carboxylate (purple dotted arrow in Scheme 2)
followed by radical β-scission of the C1−C2 bond, a
mechanism akin to those of the electrolytic Kolbe reaction
and the oxidation of 4-hydroxyphenylacetate initiated by a thiyl
radical in hydroxyphenylacetate decarboxylase (HPAD).41
We consider it more likely that an unusual fragmentation of
an intermediate that would normally be a precursor to the
succinate-coordinated ferryl complex, such as the unstable
Fe(IV)-peroxyhemiketal complex or Fe(II) persuccinate
intermediate, preempts its formation in the EF pathway
(Scheme 2). In a mechanism envisaged by Martinez et al.,13,17
the unstable Fe(IV)-peroxyhemiketal complex would fragment
between C2 and C3 rather than between C1 and C2, thus
generating an oxalate-coordinated rather than a succinate-
coordinated ferryl complex. Oxidative fragmentation of the
oxalate to the C1- and C2-derived CO2 molecules would
proceed by inner-sphere ET to the ferryl complex, decarbox-
ylation of the oxalyl radical, and reduction of the Fe(III) center
by the formate radical, similar to the mechanism of the
manganese-dependent oxalate oxidase.42,43 In principle, the
unique C2−C3 fragmentation could occur by a polar or radical
mechanism (Scheme 2), but the heterolytic pathway would
require the strained bicyclic complexwhich is already
thought to be unstable44to adopt a conformation with
appropriate orbital alignment across the seven atomic centers
involved, and the homolytic pathway would generate an Fe(V)
complex, unprecedented for the Fe/2OG-oxygenase class.
Interestingly, in proposing the Fe(IV)-peroxyhemiketal com-
plex as the likely branchpoint and thereby implying that
pathway bifurcation precedes ferryl formation, Martinez et al.
also posited that encroachment of the Phe283 side chain
toward the open coordination site of the cofactor upon L-Arg
binding could promote ethylene production by impeding
rearrangement of an “offline” ferryl complex to an inline
configuration required for L-Arg hydroxylation. According to
this hypothesis, displacement of the active-site Phe caused by
the increased length/bulk of the Glu ligand in the D191E EFE
variant might, in principle, cause the change in partition ratio.
However, the position of the Phe283 side chain is essentially
unchanged by the ligand substitution (Figure S6). Given that
we do not discern an obvious structural rationale for the
marked shift in the EF:RO partition ratio, it is possible that the
basis is more dynamic than structural or, alternatively, arises
from structural changes too subtle to detect.
(Scheme 2). One possible mechanism of ethylene formation
from the Fe(II) persuccinate intermediatea seven-center
Grob-like fragmentation, wherein the nucleofugal oxygen is
bound to the iron centerwould seem likely to require
concomitant protonation of this oxygen to avoid formation of
an extremely basic Fe(II)−oxo complex. An extensive
hydrogen-bonding network, which includes the cosubstrate
along with Arg171, Glu84, and the L-Arg substrate, could
deliver the requisite proton(s). Alternatively, as has been
explored extensively in studies of heme enzymes and model
complexes,46 homolysis of the iron-coordinated peroxide could
compete with the canonical heterolysis, generating the
Fe(III)−(hydr)oxo/succin-1-yl state that would break down
as previously delineated. Given that neither of these two
alternative fragmentations of the Fe(II) peroxysuccinate
complex is known to occur in any other Fe/2OG enzyme,
unique electrostatic features within the EFE active site would
seem to be required to counteract the favored polarity of the
O−O cleavage step. In this respect, it seems possible that the
flipped L-Arg orientation could have greater import than
merely ensuring strict regiochemistry for the ferryl-mediated
HAT step in the minor RO pathway. In this orientation, the
substrate guanidinium stacks with the side chain guanidinium
of Arg171 (Figure 5). This counterintuitive pairing of like-
charged Arg side chains in peptides and proteins has received
considerable attention over the past decade and has been
explained computationally.47−50 Its uniqueness to EFE among
the L-Arg processing Fe/2OG oxygenases, the reported
sensitivity of the EF pathway to modifications to L-Arg and
substitutions of residues that interact with it, and the close
proximity of the guanidinium pair to the cofactor (especially to
the expected location of the coordinated peroxide of the
peroxysuccinate intermediate) all suggest that this feature of
the EFE•substrates complex might have a role in lowering the
barrier for a noncanonical fragmentation of the intermediate
that commits to ethylene production.
CONCLUSIONS
■
A ferryl complex accumulates in the reaction of EFE, but
quantitative analysis of time-dependent absorption and
̈
Mossbauer spectra implies that it forms in only approximately
one-third of the events. The 16-fold extension of its lifetime by
the presence of deuterium at C5 of L-Argwithout impact to
the EF:RO partition ratioproves that the ferryl complex
forms only along the RO pathway, beyond the reaction
branchpoint. Thus, the D191E ligand substitution, which
virtually abolishes the EF reaction, also promotes accumulation
of ∼4 times as much of the ferryl complex. The identity of the
branchpoint intermediate and mechanism of the step leading
to ethylene production remain to be established, but it is clear
from results presented here and elsewhere that the marginal,
selective stabilization of the transition state for this step by the
wt enzyme is quite fragile. The basis for the differential
robustness of the two pathways and whether an even greater
degree of relative stabilization of the ethylene-committing
transition state is possible are intriguing questions for the
future.
In our view, the crystallographically validated Fe(II)-
persuccinate complex,45 which canonically undergoes O−O
bond heterolysis to generate the succinate-coordinated ferryl
intermediate, is a more likely branchpoint between the RO and
EF pathways than the Fe(IV)-peroxyhemiketal complex
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
sı
* Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at
2301
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 2293−2303